Israel’s Davidic gospel

The Greek word “gospel” (εὐαγγέλιον) enjoyed popular usage in both pagan and Jewish spheres long before early Christians appropriated it as a summary of their preaching. Though Christians have since emptied the word of its political content—leaving only the gospel of personal, otherworldly salvation—the first Christians chose to deliver their message as “gospel” because of—not in spite of—the term’s established resonance. It is likely, therefore, that these Christians viewed their gospel of the arrival of God’s kingdom over the earth little differently than they viewed the pagan gospel of Caesar’s reign over the earth.1 Soon God would rule the nations, not a pagan king (cf. Psalm 82:8). Soon God’s servants would judge for the empire what was good, evil, honorable, and dishonorable—not Caesar.

A look at the use of the εὐαγγέλιον word-family in the Greek scriptures, particularly in the Saul-David cycle, only reinforces this picture.

  • In 1 Samuel 31:9 the Philistines bring home “good news” to their people and to their idols that Israel’s king has died in battle. King Saul’s looted armor and severed head serve to symbolize this gospel according to Israel’s enemies. As they adorn their temples and walls with Saul’s body and armor (1 Samuel 31:10), the Philistines rejoice in the power of their gods to subdue Israel.
  • David refuses to receive the news of Saul’s death as gospel, despite his prior conflicts with the king (2 Samuel 4:9-12). David recognizes that this “gospel” is good news only to the uncircumcised and therefore curses its messengers (2 Samuel 1:19-20).
  • King David reluctantly receives news that his son and rival has died as “gospel” (2 Samuel 18:20). Absalom the usurper has perished and, to David’s chagrin, the rule of God’s anointed king is once again secure. David’s servant exclaims: “Good tidings (εὐαγγέλιον) for my lord the king! For the Lord has vindicated you this day, delivering you from the power of all who rose up against you” (2 Samuel 18:31).
  • The enemies of David’s rightful heir await “good news” that Adonijah has wrested Israel’s throne from Solomon (1 Kings 1:42). Their gospel of rebellion against God and king, like the gospel reported by the Philistines, is thwarted.
  • Hannah’s psalm which opens and directs the book of Samuel lays out Israel’s gospel-hope in this way: “[The Lord] will judge the ends of the earth, he will give power to our kings and he will raise up the horn2 of his anointed ruler” (1 Samuel 2:10).

In each of these cases εὐαγγέλιον regards the concrete fate of Israel and the concrete status of her king. Such political and historical matters are the content of this gospel. Will the Philistines annex Israel as the death of Saul forewarns? Will an unrighteous Absalom topple David’s God-given rule? Will Adonijah ascend the throne without his father’s (or God’s) confirmation?

Or better yet, will God sooner or later, despite ups and downs, exalt David’s noble house over Israel and the nations as he promised (2 Samuel 7:4-17, cf. Amos 9:11-15)? Will this, Israel’s true gospel, prevail upon the earth? Or will the gospel of David’s enemies forever resound among the nations?

As early Christians permeated the idolatrous world, announcing the imminent return of David’s righteous son in power as their εὐαγγέλιον, they declared that these long-held questions, Israel’s questions, had finally and definitively been answered. The political order constructed by and for pagans was now coming to an end. God’s Davidic servant would soon subjugate the nations for the sake of his people.

1—See the Calendar Inscription of Priene.

2—With his “horn” raised by God, Israel’s king can wage war and garner respect.

12 thoughts on “Israel’s Davidic gospel

  1. Now the question becomes, In what way is this *also* good news for pagans? The subjugation of the nations sounds like an anti-gospel for the members of those nations. Yet almost immediately it seems that the first Jesus followers thought it necessary to bring the gospel to them. Why would they expect them to receive this news?

    This is such a fascinating topic!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Right, not something I considered here but I think my post on the Gerasene delves into it a bit.

      To answer though, I might start with a text like Romans 1 where idolatry is viewed as the source of moral confusion, strife, and wickedness while subjection to God, in effect, brings about peace and clarity of the human faculties. For those already suspicious of idolatry and the moral/political order built upon it, Paul’s (Jewish) message here might have been appealing.

      There might also have been a sense in which the nations subject to God were to be blessed on account of their obedience–probably along the lines of Deuteronomy 28 and Leviticus 26. Who wouldn’t want their crops, people, and nation protected and empowered by the high god?

      I imagine that by going to the pagans Christians wanted to give such people a chance to respond favorably to Israel’s exaltation before that exaltation actually happened–in the tradition of the Hebrew prophets. It wasn’t strictly necessary that the nations hear the news, but it gave them the opportunity to acknowledge God and his people on their own accord.

      In large part I think early Christians convinced pagans through the use of signs and wonders. Such powers were proof that Israel’s God was supreme and was about to act on a global scale.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.